Blood Class and Empire The Enduring Anglo American Relationship In the wake of the terrorist attacks of and Britain s relationship with America seems to have intensified Through an analysis of its various manifestations from James Bond to Winston Churchi

  • Title: Blood, Class and Empire: The Enduring Anglo-American Relationship
  • Author: Christopher Hitchens
  • ISBN: 9781843545101
  • Page: 468
  • Format: Paperback
  • In the wake of the terrorist attacks of 9 11 and 7 7, Britain s relationship with America seems to have intensified Through an analysis of its various manifestations from James Bond to Winston Churchill this book asks what this relationship consists of.

    • [PDF] Í Free Read ☆ Blood, Class and Empire: The Enduring Anglo-American Relationship : by Christopher Hitchens ↠
      468 Christopher Hitchens
    • thumbnail Title: [PDF] Í Free Read ☆ Blood, Class and Empire: The Enduring Anglo-American Relationship : by Christopher Hitchens ↠
      Posted by:Christopher Hitchens
      Published :2019-01-03T04:12:57+00:00

    One thought on “Blood, Class and Empire: The Enduring Anglo-American Relationship”

    1. This 1990 study of the "special relationship" between America and Britain has been everything I wanted it to be: long, detailed, personalized and written with the impossible wit and sharpness of Hitchens' mind. The discussion surrounding politics and policies and trades between the two countries is heavily researched, so much so that the author brings in clippings and fragments of letters and essays or books of well known (or not so well known) public figures and proves points through their medi [...]

    2. Finished! My gosh, this was crunchy. Hitchens covers the entire history from the founding of the United States through 1990, and of the United Kingdom during that time span, and assumes a certain amount of knowledge on the part of the reader. Which was very nice and not at all condescending and I've realized (without much surprise) I have some massive holes in my knowledge of both histories. That said, despite my moments of confusion I found this a fascinating read. For one, Hitchens has a very [...]

    3. Interesting read, despite having been written almost a quarter of a century ago. The story of British - American relations, and the "special relationship", which turns out not to be that special after all, unsurprisingly.I read a review of this book on here which said that Hitchens makes the mistake of thinking the reader is as clever as he is. In my case, that definitely wasn't the case, and I found myself scratching my head at some of the names and events he mentioned in passing, but even so, [...]

    4. While not as provocative as some of his writing, I suspect this one will get some people's goat. In it he argues that the US-British relationship is far shabbier than we thought. On the one hand, the American upper class and its adherents see British class structures and Imperial grandeur as justification and guidance for their own attempts to create a New Rome. On the other, the British leadership sees the relationship as one that allows them to maintain a sense of undeserved greatness, all whi [...]

    5. Reading a (presumably) earlier version called _Blood, Class, & Nostalgia_. Hitchens is a little impressed with his own vocabulary prowess, has some axes to grind, and states opinions, or at least undocumented facts, as facts. The book is also rather dated. It's dealing with history, but was written in the 1980's, and seems to have been inspired at least in part by the Princess Di cult in the U.S. and the relationship between Thatcher and Reagan. Not a fun read, but it was thought-provoking a [...]

    6. i am a big christopher hitchens fan but i am very sorry to say that this book was just terrible was a very hard read infact and i still was able to read it twice is one of the most hardest and difficult book i have read is about politics is about the relationship of great britain and america is about the anglo-american relationship talks about winston churchill and roosevelt was long and boring , i dont know what else to say.

    7. Review title: The relative viscosity of blood and waterHitchens is a well-known pundit and paradox, a serious thinker who inhabits the entertainment world of American cable news channels, who makes serious points with acerbic wit and erudite language (it is not many writers who use words that make me scramble as often to google the nuances of the meaning). And he is unmistakably British in character, looks, and voice. Perhaps, then he is not such a paradox at all."Blood" is a serious look at the [...]

    8. At times sober, at others very funny, this is a simultaneous critique and celebration of the Anglo-American relationship. Christopher Hitchens, a duel citizen of both Britain and the United States, analyses all the characteristics of the "special relationship": the ties of language and literature, family and blood; the antagonism and resentment that existed (and for some still does); a genuine sense of shared sacrifice in war; the American obsession with British affectations ("Just keep talking, [...]

    9. Interesting for an old Brit to read Hitchens view of the "special relationship", and his account of the rise of the US to world empire. He treats the question thematically, giving pride of place to Rudyard Kipling's disgraceful "white man's burden." Not so well known now is what this poem was all about, (not obvious it turns out either what the burden was, or whose Kipling thought it was)or that Kipling was still writing in World War II, with Churchill sending special editions of his efforts to [...]

    10. Christopher Hitchens' non-fiction prose is always a pleasure to read--even when I strenuously disagree with the assertions being offered. Fortunately, I found little to disagree with in this book. It is an engaging and enlightening exposition of the creation of the modern world. Many readers will find it a startling retelling of conventional history. For instance, who knows that an American general, Gracey, rearmed Japanese prisoners of war to fight a Vietnamese insurgency at the close of WW II? [...]

    11. Hitchens wrote this book for those who are already well versed in both British and United States history. Never are the "characters" introduced so much as brought in at a point where the casual reader could appreciate Hitchen's biting wit about them.Whenever he would mention a historical figure that I would know, this book became fascinating so I'm sure for those starting out in his intended audience (that being history majors in the United Kingdom it would seem) I'm sure it's brilliant.What is [...]

    12. You can clearly hear the late, great Hitchens' voice in the prose of Blood, Class and Empire. He had a great way of weaving together a clear picture in the seemingly tangled clumps of historical literature. The only problem is that the reader needs to be up on American and English history in order to understand most of the book. For example, Hitchens mentions the big Suez Canal brouhaha in the 1950s yet does not explain it. You gotta work in order to "get" this book. Nothing is handed to you on [...]

    13. Interesting take on the "special relationship" that exists between the British empire in decline and the American empire. One of the more heavy books from hitch that I've read. The list of "to-read" history books from his references will keep me busy for a while. Took a while to finish with a ton of trips to .

    14. I got really bored with this book. I guess I just don't care if Americans have an idealized view of the British, or if our relationship with them is complicated and greatly fictionalized. The information was good and very detailed and cited, I just couldn't care enough about it to be really interested.

    15. Chewy. A book that would probably profit one more if one had already gone through a few other books first. I love Christopher Hitchens, and there are a few wonderful bon mot, but this is far from his best.

    16. This wonderful book gives the US culture insights into how and why we continue to maintain such a strong relationship with a government that we once viewed as tyrannical.

    17. Written in 1990 but so relevant still. I love how he marries the cultural and the political to illustrate the Anglo-American relationship.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *